Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

ACTUARIAL SALARY SURVEYS - From Entry to Fellow

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2012, 01:58 AM
Rex Ryan's Avatar
Rex Ryan Rex Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 901
Default Obama is bad for business, jobs, economy

Inspired by discussion of regulations on small business in other thread.

Quote:
But in just under three years, the Obama Administration has hurt American business more than all these Administrations put together.

Let's see: Obama appointees at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have not only blocked Boeing from making planes in South Carolina, but they have greased the speed of union elections, made decertification votes impossible, changed the requirement that a majority of workers vote for a union, and required almost every workplace in America to put posters up advising workers of their unionization rights.

The Obama Administration claims to want to double exports and support free trade, but it took it nearly three years to send the pending trade agreements with Panama, Colombia and South Korea to Congress. Which means that in all this time American companies have been paying higher tariffs for exports.

The Obama Administration has proposed 219 new rules affecting industries, each of which will cost at least $100 million to comply. While the Washington legal business is growing, every industry and business is affected, scared, and confused by the massive new proposals. Small businesses are especially overwhelmed and must hire lawyers to understand and comply with the massive amount of new regulation.

The Obama crown-jewel "achievements" of the new health care and Dodd-Frank financial laws adversely affect almost every American business, totaled almost 3,000 pages of statutory language, and will result in huge costs on employers.

I believe President Obama is not anti-business. Nor is he pro-business. He doesn't have the experience to be either. I think he wants more American jobs but he has hired hordes of bright, passionate, and aggressive political appointees primarily committed to various causes. The causes sadly have little to do with jobs or business and more often focus on the environment, social justice, and union rights. More important, Obama's politically appointed officials generally lack any significant business experience.

What else makes this Administration anti-business? It has proposed rules for government employees restricting their ability to help host and participate in major trade events like our International CES, which is held each January in Las Vegas. So while we host 30,000 international government officials and trade visitors, U.S. government employees would not be able to attend. By comparison, our competitor in Germany has its chancellor, Angela Merkel, attending and hosting a welcome dinner every year. We can't even get a welcome letter out of the White House. So let's make our smallest companies travel abroad if they hope to export.

And if all this isn't enough, what about the president's class warfare rhetoric? "Corporations" and "greed" seem to go together in every Obama address. "Spread the wealth around" and all forms of higher taxes on successful entrepreneurs are part of the president's reelection platform. I don't recall a President benefiting from so much American innovative business success (Facebook, Google, Twitter, Groupon and scores more) who is so hostile to the concept of the American Dream.

So is this Administration the most anti-business in recent memory?

Yes. No one else even comes close.
http://spectator.org/archives/2011/1...tration-the-mo

Article doesn't mention Obama energy policy, blocking keystone, gulf drilling bans, on and on. Business is his enemy. Profit is evil. His policies are bad for business, economy and jobs.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:02 AM
2pac Shakur's Avatar
2pac Shakur 2pac Shakur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: short
Posts: 73,280
Default

Does recent memory mean < 4 years?
Didn't Bush turn a surplus into near collapse of our entire banking system in 8 years?
And you guys think the answer is to go back to (R)?

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:02 AM
2pac Shakur's Avatar
2pac Shakur 2pac Shakur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: short
Posts: 73,280
Default

Voting for a (D) or an (R) is just idiocy.

Wait, voting period is idiocy.

I mean that in a nice way. Like maybe an idiot savant.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:12 AM
Rex Ryan's Avatar
Rex Ryan Rex Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2pac Shakur View Post
Does recent memory mean < 4 years?
Didn't Bush turn a surplus into near collapse of our entire banking system in 8 years?
And you guys think the answer is to go back to (R)?

The topic is Obama. If the best defense for Obama is to measure him by your Bush yardstick then that shows how bad he is.

Isn't it time for someone better than Obama or Bush? Someone like Romney?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:16 AM
Rex Ryan's Avatar
Rex Ryan Rex Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 901
Default

Quote:
The man who took the biggest beating was White House chief of staff Bill Daley, who met with members of the National Association of Manufacturers and was practically run out of the room by its membership.

"There is a reason that many of these senior executive meetings are held in private," says a senior NAM staffer, who helped organize the Daley speech and Q&A session, which was open to the press. "What you saw there was why."

Daley was roasted for the Obama Administration's zeal in imposing regulations on businesses from virtually every federal agency and Cabinet-level department. Daley, a former business executive himself, was supposed to be the man who was going to fix the Obama Administration's anti-business standing. But Daley, while talking a good game, has failed to rein in the President and his ideologically driven cohorts in the federal agencies.

Daley's speech before NAM was met with polite applause, but when the question and answer period started, all civility went out the door, to the point that Daley ultimately admitted that many of the administration's policies were "indefensible."
...

The Obama Administration's war on business, though, isn't having a negative effect on its fundraising for 2012 -- at least in Washington, D.C. Democratic National Committee and Obama re-elect sources say that they have commitments from executives from virtually every major U.S. corporation to host or co-host fundraisers in the coming months.

"At some point, you wish that some executive would show the spine to say, 'Enough. I've learned my lesson, you can't weigh me down with regulations and expect me to help you get elected so you can do it to me again and again and again,'" says a Republican fundraiser. "But that hasn't happened yet."
http://spectator.org/archives/2011/0...iness-as-usual

The bully has created a climate of fear in business. The shake down continues.

Last edited by Rex Ryan; 04-13-2012 at 02:46 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:40 AM
RazorGuns's Avatar
RazorGuns RazorGuns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood,ca
Posts: 2,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2pac Shakur View Post
Does recent memory mean < 4 years?
Didn't Bush turn a surplus into near collapse of our entire banking system in 8 years?
And you guys think the answer is to go back to (R)?

Word. Didn't that Bush guy also lie to us abou WMD's and get a few THOUSAND americans killed while raping taxpayers a trillion or so? And didn't those previous presidents let illegal immigration go wild, get so may people killed in vietnam, and let gas supply go to dangerous levels in the 70's. We even had one president who loved bj's in the white house.

People quickly forget how bad other presidents have been. Obama ain't great, but others have been pretty great either.

It's what happens when the sheep citizens get to choose betwen two bad millionaire choices every 4 years
__________________
I want to live in a world where a chicken can cross a road without its motives being questioned.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:45 AM
Rex Ryan's Avatar
Rex Ryan Rex Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RazorGuns View Post
Word. Didn't that Bush guy also lie to us abou WMD's and get a few THOUSAND americans killed while raping taxpayers a trillion or so? And didn't those previous presidents let illegal immigration go wild, get so may people killed in vietnam, and let gas supply go to dangerous levels in the 70's. We even had one president who loved bj's in the white house.

People quickly forget how bad other presidents have been. Obama ain't great, but others have been pretty great either.

It's what happens when the sheep citizens get to choose betwen two bad millionaire choices every 4 years
You two should take Ozzie Guillen and move to Cuba imo. They don't have elections there or if they do, they decide who you vote for. And that way you can say how Fidel is better than the last guy so its ok that you have no vote.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2012, 04:24 AM
RazorGuns's Avatar
RazorGuns RazorGuns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hollywood,ca
Posts: 2,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex Ryan View Post
You two should take Ozzie Guillen and move to Cuba imo. They don't have elections there or if they do, they decide who you vote for. And that way you can say how Fidel is better than the last guy so its ok that you have no vote.
All presidents are crooks and I don't trust any of them (except for Reagan).

It's how I sleep at night. Stop tryign to ruin my sleep.
__________________
I want to live in a world where a chicken can cross a road without its motives being questioned.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-13-2012, 08:17 AM
swifthat swifthat is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex Ryan View Post
The topic is Obama. If the best defense for Obama is to measure him by your Bush yardstick then that shows how bad he is.

Isn't it time for someone better than Obama or Bush? Someone like Romney?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-13-2012, 09:04 AM
Rex Ryan's Avatar
Rex Ryan Rex Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RazorGuns View Post
All presidents are crooks and I don't trust any of them (except for Reagan).

It's how I sleep at night. Stop tryign to ruin my sleep.
Time to wake up and smell the Romney. We've never tried a Mormon in the oval office before. He's going to be different than the rest. Time for hope and change. We tried vanilla. We tried chocolate and it still left a bad taste in our mouth. Time to try a new flavor. Mormon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.47987 seconds with 7 queries