Quote:
Originally Posted by yonsjoo
A2TRM, Clearly you did not write this May sitting or don't know what you are talking about. This exam made the very best of well prepared candidate unable to Finish it. It took the instructor, the person who's suppose to be on top of this, over 3 hours to finish it for god's sake. Clearly SOA was not prepared for this outcome, thus screwed up should not offend them that much. Most of my buddies who took it with me didn't even bother to go for PAK as they were trying their ass off getting one more question done. I do not think that PAKers result in this sitting reflects any useful outcome, if any, it indicates how horrible this sitting was from number of people bothered to PAK. I believe it is perfectly legitimate to talk about a pass mark under 55%.
|
You might be right. However, your anecdotal evidence is not supported by any aggregate data I've seen so far. All the aggregate results I've seen appear comparable to the historical results of actuarial exams (35%-40% of candidates passing based on passmark of 17/30).
I'm sorry Exam MLC isn't offered 5-6 times per year and doesn't have a 50%+ passing % every sitting. Welcome to a real actuarial exam.