![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
Bengaluru - Chennai - Hyderabad - Pune |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Page C6 of JAM it says : Buy option at higher assumed volatility than can sell option, which means terminating caps and floors can be expensive"
Dear God , someone please help me understand this!!! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you buy an option at higher assumed volatility, then the increased assumed volatility increases option prices (relative to lower assumed vol).
If you sell at lower assumed volatility, then the lowered volatility decreases option prices (relative to higher assumed vol). Thus, these differing assumptions yield a bid-ask spread of sorts. I'd be curious to know whether this is in addition to a typical transaction cost. Anyone know? Thanks. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In 8V it talks about the "bid-ask" spread of volatility, so I'd say it's probably "in addition".
__________________
"But I'll try to carry off a little darkness on my back, 'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black" Johnny Cash |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, it would make sense that such spreads be 'in addition' -- given that the authors are making a point of the expense of terminating caps/floors....... txs
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|