Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

United Kingdom
Actuarial Jobs

General Insurance, Life & Other Areas

Canada
Actuarial Jobs

Casualty, Life,
Pension,
Health &
Investment

Entry Level
Actuarial Jobs

All Disciplines
Health, Life, Pension, Casualty, Investment

D.W. Simpson
& Company

Actuarial
Recruiters

Worldwide
www.dwsimpson.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2004, 12:43 PM
Brutè's Avatar
Brutè Brutè is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The 'shoe
Posts: 2,330
Default MII (A + da = 1)

Most Important Identity, as Batten calls it. From Chap 5.

A + da = 1

Does this not work for n-year, fully discrete term?

For example, if we're given q's and i on a three year term we can figure out Ax by using v q0 + v^2 p0 q1 + .....

But can we use the resulting Ax and the MII to figure ax or do you have to find ax the long way too? (1 + vp0 + ...)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2004, 04:28 PM
E's Avatar
E E is offline
Eddie Smith
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Geographically, the Southeast, but virtually, everywhere.
College: UGA
Posts: 8,013
Default

The insurance factor must either be a WL insurance or an endowment to use the "most important identity" to calculate the corresponding annuity factor. If you know the term insurance factor, simply add on a pure endowment factor and then use the MII.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2004, 05:30 PM
Sunny Sunny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E
The insurance factor must either be a WL insurance or an endowment to use the "most important identity" to calculate the corresponding annuity factor. If you know the term insurance factor, simply add on a pure endowment factor and then use the MII.
hmm.. really....

I would have intuitively guessed that it's true for WL and pure endowment, but not endownment or term....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2004, 08:57 AM
funk1's Avatar
funk1 funk1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Post Exam C Coma
Posts: 1,054
Default

Just remember, in Batten speak, the "two twin benefits." That is, you can go directly from endowment ins to def ann and from whole life to whole life. No other way about it if you do it in one step (yes, adding the pure end is req to ultimately get to term ins). This is true for the variance of the annuity random variable as well where you have the variance for the insurance in the numerator and d or delta in the denominator.
In your mind, you should try to connect all that together and that will keep you from making illegal assumptions on exam questions involved with this.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2004, 07:49 PM
Sunny Sunny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,940
Default

Again, question here, do you mean from WL to WL annuity and term benefit to term annuity? I'm lost!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2004, 03:15 PM
Jim Daniel's Avatar
Jim Daniel Jim Daniel is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Davis, CA
College: Wabash College 1962 (!)
Posts: 1,732
Default

The relation "a = (1 - A) / r"
holds:
1) with "a" meaning "a-double-dot" and "A" meaning "A" and "r" meaning the discount rate "d"
and
2) with "a" meaning "a-bar" and "A" meaning "A-bar" and "r" meaning "delta".

In both cases, EITHER put a status like "40" or "x" or "x:y" or "xy-last-survivor" as subcripts on _both_ "a" and "A", OR put one of those statuses with an "angle-n" added on as subscripts on _both_ "a" and "A".

Jim Daniel
__________________
Jim Daniel
Jim Daniel's Actuarial Seminars
www.actuarialseminars.com
jimdaniel@actuarialseminars.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2004, 11:11 PM
Sunny Sunny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,940
Default

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.34779 seconds with 7 queries