![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
United Kingdom | Canada
| Entry Level |
D.W. Simpson |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Victor invests 300 into a bank account at the beginning of each year for 20 years. The account pays out interest at the end of every year at an annual effective interest rate of i%. The interest is reinvested at an annual effective rate of (i/2)%.
The yield rate on the entire investment over the 20 year period is 8% annual effective. Determine i. The solution says: 300 s (double dot) 20 | 8% = 20 (300) + 300i (Is) 20 | i/2% 14826.88 = 6000 + 300i (s 21 | i/2% - 21) / (i/2) why did they change (Is) 20 to 21???? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
they didn't say anything...
that's exactly what the solution says and then that's how they solve it from there |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
That was my point: You seem to think they changed (Is)20 to (Is)21. Why?
Aren't both of these formulas valid: (Is)_immediate_20 = (s_due_20 - 20)/i and (Is)_immediate_20 = (s_immediate_21 - 21)/i? If both formulas are valid ways to evaluate (Is)_immediate_20, I don't see how we can probe into their minds to decide why they chose the version they did. They needed to evaluate (Is). They evaluated it. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
gotcha...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|