Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Life Actuarial Jobs
& Annuities,

& Investments
Worldwide

Salary Surveys
Life & Health

Pension
Property & Casualty

DW Simpson & Co.
Actuarial
Recruitment
Worldwide

Casualty Jobs
& Property -- Worldwide
Reinsurance,

Insurance, Bureaus & Consulting


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2004, 10:49 AM
eric eric is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Default Where is "Brownian Motion"?

I spent a great deal of time studying on "Brownian Motion" but there is no "Brownian Motion" question found on the two previous exams (Nov and Fall 2004). A lot of people don't like those kind of questions but I like them (because I studied so much on that topic).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-17-2004, 10:51 AM
windy windy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 118
Default

I don't see the practical use of Brownian motion. I think normal approximation is enough to covered normal distribution.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-17-2004, 10:57 AM
eric eric is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by windy
I don't see the practical use of Brownian motion. I think normal approximation is enough to covered normal distribution.
I think it is a good topic for course 3 exams. BM can be normal and can also be log-normal. Let's say the stock price (geometic BM) now is 10. What's the prob that it will hit 13 before dropping to 6?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2004, 11:05 AM
Browser's Avatar
Browser Browser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Preston Idaho
Posts: 385
Default

Hey I remember that formula eric. It is B/(B+A) Where B is up and A is down. Therefor your questions answer is 4/7. Am I right?????

Just because it is on the syllabus deosn't mean they have to cover it. If they did that then they wouldn't have enough questions left to ask about stuff we have NEVER seen before.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-17-2004, 12:44 PM
Sunny Sunny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesome Kicker
Hey I remember that formula eric. It is B/(B+A) Where B is up and A is down. Therefor your questions answer is 4/7. Am I right?????

Just because it is on the syllabus deosn't mean they have to cover it. If they did that then they wouldn't have enough questions left to ask about stuff we have NEVER seen before.
That is also the abbreviated form for the Gambler's ruin problem (in the case the probability of loss is 0.5), which the Brownian Motion also alludes to in some cases (in the case there is no drift).

I personally think (Geometric) Brownian Motion can be actually extremely useful irl, such as in the case of modeling the stock prices as eric has mentioned.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-17-2004, 01:14 PM
Skantown's Avatar
Skantown Skantown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangemen Country
Posts: 217
Default

Brownian Motion, especially Geometric Brownian, is the fundamental building block of option pricing theory (remember Black-Scholes from Course II??). It seems like the syllabus should tie Brownian into Black-Scholes somehow. It's a somewhat obscure topic by itself.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-17-2004, 01:41 PM
funk1's Avatar
funk1 funk1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Post Exam C Coma
Posts: 1,054
Default

Apparently, it is tied to rabbit and turtle races now .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2004, 02:07 PM
eric eric is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesome Kicker
Hey I remember that formula eric. It is B/(B+A) Where B is up and A is down. Therefor your questions answer is 4/7. Am I right?????

Just because it is on the syllabus deosn't mean they have to cover it. If they did that then they wouldn't have enough questions left to ask about stuff we have NEVER seen before.
Unfortunately, you're not right. This is ONLY true if it's standard Brownian Motion, but not geometic motion. I think if this question was on the exam, a lot of people would get the wrong answer.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.29087 seconds with 7 queries