Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Diversions
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson & Company International Actuary Jobs
  Canada  Asia  Australia  Life  Pension  Casualty
Bermuda, United Kingdom, Europe, Asia, Worldwide


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2004, 04:35 PM
Tim>< Tim>< is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 19,753
Default BtPotEC Ghost Forum: Comments on Summary Threads

I am starting this thread in order that people can respond to specific points raised in the Summary Thread without adding clutter. If you guys feel that this thread adds unnecessary clutter, PM me and I will delete it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Sigma
Will Durant: A small point in his favor is his failure to bandwagon on the slaying of Oblomov. He would have done better as EC to have joined the bandwagon and had Oblomov lynched, rather than draw attention to himself for his refusal. For example, if Oblomov had turned out to be EC, I think we would all be highly suspicious of Will Durant about now. The fact that Oblomov was not EC makes a slight argument that Will Durant is not EC.

I also think Gandalf's argument for Will Durant's innocence is pretty good -- the fact that Will sent Gandalf a PM asking why everyone followed along with the slayer's suggestion. I would expect EC to fully understand this already. If they were going to feign innocence, I can see them making a public posting, but I doubt they would further send a PM to Gandalf.
I disagree. It is some people's nature to be defensive when accused, regardless of how innocuous the accusation. Yoda's constant bickering with 2Pac is consistent with this. So is my own and I was somewhat defensive.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2004, 09:33 AM
Gandalf's Avatar
Gandalf Gandalf is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
SOA
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 26,464
Default Re: Comments on Summary Threads

Quote:
Originally Posted by karma police
I am starting this thread in order that people can respond to specific points raised in the Summary Thread without adding clutter. If you guys feel that this thread adds unnecessary clutter, PM me and I will delete it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Sigma
Will Durant: A small point in his favor is his failure to bandwagon on the slaying of Oblomov. He would have done better as EC to have joined the bandwagon and had Oblomov lynched, rather than draw attention to himself for his refusal. For example, if Oblomov had turned out to be EC, I think we would all be highly suspicious of Will Durant about now. The fact that Oblomov was not EC makes a slight argument that Will Durant is not EC.

I also think Gandalf's argument for Will Durant's innocence is pretty good -- the fact that Will sent Gandalf a PM asking why everyone followed along with the slayer's suggestion. I would expect EC to fully understand this already. If they were going to feign innocence, I can see them making a public posting, but I doubt they would further send a PM to Gandalf.
I disagree. It is some people's nature to be defensive when accused, regardless of how innocuous the accusation. Yoda's constant bickering with 2Pac is consistent with this. So is my own and I was somewhat defensive.
I just got around to reading this. I agree with with the "be defensive" completely - I sure was; Avi sure was - but don't put Will's PM into that class. I had not said anything against him, so he was not in "defensive" mode with me. The PM seemed like genuine newbie curiosity to me. I can post it if anyone would like to see it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.23792 seconds with 7 queries