Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Life Actuarial Jobs
& Annuities,

& Investments
Worldwide

Salary Surveys
Life & Health

Pension
Property & Casualty

DW Simpson & Co.
Actuarial
Recruitment
Worldwide

Casualty Jobs
& Property -- Worldwide
Reinsurance,

Insurance, Bureaus & Consulting


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2004, 12:14 PM
Happy Extinction's Avatar
Happy Extinction Happy Extinction is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Above Español
Posts: 2,939
Default Newsflash: Gov't too incompetant to construct a conspiracy

Quote:
So let's start with a broad question: would U.S. officials be capable of such a foul deed? Capable -- as in able to pull it off and willing to do so. Simply put, the spies and special agents are not good enough, evil enough, or gutsy enough to mount this operation. That conclusion is based partly on, dare I say it, common sense, but also on years spent covering national security matters. (For a book I wrote on the CIA, I interviewed over 100 CIA officials and employees.)

Not good enough: Such a plot -- to execute the simultaneous destruction of the two towers, a piece of the Pentagon, and four airplanes and make it appear as if it all was done by another party -- is far beyond the skill level of U.S. intelligence. It would require dozens (or scores or hundreds) of individuals to attempt such a scheme. They would have to work together, and trust one another not to blow their part or reveal the conspiracy. They would hail from an assortment of agencies (CIA, FBI, INS, Customs, State, FAA, NTSB, DOD, etc.).

Yet anyone with the most basic understanding of how government functions (or does not function) realizes that the various bureaucracies of Washington -- particularly those of the national security "community" -- do not work well together. Even covering up advance knowledge would require an extensive plot. If there truly had been intelligence reports predicting the 9/11 attacks, these reports would have circulated through intelligence and policymaking circles before the folks at the top decided to smother them for geopolitical gain. That would make for a unwieldy conspiracy of silence. And in either scenario -- planning the attacks or permitting them to occur -- everyone who participated in the conspiracy would have to be freakin' sure that all the other plotters would stay quiet.

Not evil enough. This is as foul as it gets -- to kill thousands of Americans, including Pentagon employees, to help out oil companies. (The sacrificial lambs could have included White House staff or members of Congress, had the fourth plane not crashed in Pennsylvania.) This is a Hollywood-level of dastardliness, James Bond (or Dr. Evil) material.

Are there enough people of such a bent in all those agencies? That's doubtful. CIA officers and American officials have been evildoers. They have supported death squads and made use of drug dealers overseas. They have assisted torturers, disseminated assassination manuals, sold weapons to terrorist-friendly governments, undermined democratically-elected governments, and aided dictators who murder and maim. They have covered up reports of massacres and human rights abuses. They have plotted to kill foreign leaders.

These were horrendous activities, but, in most instances, the perps justified these deeds with Cold War imperatives (perverted as they were). And to make the justification easier, the victims were people overseas. Justifying the murder of thousands of Americans to help ExxonMobil would require U.S. officials to engage in a different kind of detachment and an even more profound break with decency and moral norms.
http://www.alternet.org/story/12536
__________________
don’t cheat on my dreams

BLAAAAHHHRG!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2004, 12:37 PM
2pac Shakur's Avatar
2pac Shakur 2pac Shakur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: short
Posts: 73,317
Default

incompetent
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2004, 12:38 PM
Tim>< Tim>< is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 19,753
Default

incontinent?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-17-2004, 12:40 PM
2pac Shakur's Avatar
2pac Shakur 2pac Shakur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: short
Posts: 73,317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karma police
incontinent?
No.
You?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-17-2004, 12:42 PM
Tim>< Tim>< is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 19,753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2pac Shakur
Quote:
Originally Posted by karma police
incontinent?
No.
You?
Not at the moment. Check with me after lunch.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 1.24416 seconds with 7 queries