![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
D.W. Simpson & Company International Actuary Jobs |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On page 43 of the ASM, why does one have to set lnf(x) = 0 in order to find the Variance (rather than asymtotic Variance) of the mle estimator. Thanks for your answer!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe that you use the log likelyhood instead of just the likelyhood to find the MLE because it can usually be solved in closed form. The function, f(x)=ln(x) has no extrema of its own so taking the log of something will not change it. This technique is also used in exam 1 when finding limits as x approaches 0. There is an example in the sample exam. Hopefully a professor will give you a better explanation soon.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|