Actuarial Outpost > SoA Fall 2019 FV-A #1 (c)
 Register Blogs Wiki FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

 DW SimpsonActuarial JobsVisit our site for the most up to date jobs for actuaries. Actuarial Salary SurveysProperty & Casualty, Health, Life, Pension and Non-Tradtional Jobs. Actuarial Meeting ScheduleBrowse this year's meetings and which recruiters will attend. Contact DW SimpsonHave a question? Let's talk. You'll be glad you did.

 Group & Health Advanced Exam Old Group and Health Company/Sponsor Perspective Forum

#1
03-15-2020, 06:07 PM
 fightinphilz Member SOA Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 55
Fall 2019 FV-A #1 (c)

I understand all the steps here in the SOA solution except for how they are calculating expected in-force contribution. Can someone explain how they are going from the formulas presented in the reading, to the formula they are listing there in the sample solution? namely, they say that

EC of IF business = [IBV (t-1) + RC (t-1)] x RDR

From the reading, the formula for line 5 of the AoM Report should be:
EC of IF business = IF EIBV (t) - IBV (t-1) = IBV(t-1) x RDR - IF BP(t) + CoC (t)

how do you get from the 2nd formula back to the first?
#2
03-25-2020, 10:04 AM
 Alemana19 Member SOA Join Date: Sep 2019 Posts: 181

Quote:
 Originally Posted by fightinphilz I understand all the steps here in the SOA solution except for how they are calculating expected in-force contribution. Can someone explain how they are going from the formulas presented in the reading, to the formula they are listing there in the sample solution? namely, they say that EC of IF business = [IBV (t-1) + RC (t-1)] x RDR From the reading, the formula for line 5 of the AoM Report should be: EC of IF business = IF EIBV (t) - IBV (t-1) = IBV(t-1) x RDR - IF BP(t) + CoC (t) how do you get from the 2nd formula back to the first?
I'll try to help when I get to doing problems for this objective. In the meantime, could you add in page numbers (formula in the reading) if you can? Or sections? I have both mate and the source materials so either/both work.
#3
03-27-2020, 02:05 AM
 MATEseminars.dc Member SOA Join Date: Aug 2018 College: Northern Arizona University Posts: 61
EC help

Quote:
 Originally Posted by fightinphilz I understand all the steps here in the SOA solution except for how they are calculating expected in-force contribution. Can someone explain how they are going from the formulas presented in the reading, to the formula they are listing there in the sample solution? namely, they say that EC of IF business = [IBV (t-1) + RC (t-1)] x RDR From the reading, the formula for line 5 of the AoM Report should be: EC of IF business = IF EIBV (t) - IBV (t-1) = IBV(t-1) x RDR - IF BP(t) + CoC (t) how do you get from the 2nd formula back to the first?
Hello,

Your second formula is set up right but it is not equal to "EC of IF business" as you have stated. It is equal to "the in-force business expected increase in IBV"

So it should be (see page 22 of source formula #18):
the in-force business expected increase in IBV = IF EIBV (t) - IBV (t-1) = IBV(t-1) x RDR - IF BP(t) + CoC (t)

Then to get from there to the EC of IF business ....

EC of IF business = expected increase in IBV plus expected net income (page 22 of the source material)

Using your formula: expected increase in IBV = IBV(t-1) x RDR - IF BP(t) + CoC (t)

expected net income = IF BP(t) + i(t) * RC(t-1)

Then use CoC(t) = [RDR - i(t)] * RC(t-1)

Then put it all together

IBV(t-1) x RDR - IF BP(t) + [RDR - i(t)] * RC(t-1)
+
IF BP(t) + i(t) * RC(t-1)

(the book profits and the i*RC terms fall out and you are left with your answer)

= IBV(t-1) x RDR + RDR * RC(t-1)
- IF BP(t) + IF BP(t)
- i(t) * RC(t-1) + i(t) * RC(t-1)
=[IBV(t-1) + RC(t-1)] * RDR

I hope that helps you.

-Dustin
__________________
__________________
website: www.mateseminars.com
e-mail: mateseminars.dc@gmail.com

Last edited by MATEseminars.dc; 03-30-2020 at 12:12 AM..
#4
06-23-2020, 10:37 PM
 fightinphilz Member SOA Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 55

Thanks Dustin, that helps. Now i see what's going on: They are adding together the expected contribution from the IBV and NI columns together to get the overall expected contribution from in-force and from new business, so like you said some terms cancel out and the formula simplifies.

so i guess my only question then is, in the SOA sample solution it labels row 6 as Target IBV and then row 8 as Ending IBV, but aren't those labels not accurate? Those would be the labels if we just had an IBV column. Typically I see the analysis of movement table broken out as having 2 columns, one for IBV and one for NI. so here if they are combining the two columns, row 6 should be labeled "Target IBV + Target NI" and row 8 should read "Closing IBV + Closing NI". This is especially troubling because the problem itself asks only for the AoM exhibit for IBV. Isn't the way the SOA is asking this question very misleading given that they ask for AoM for only IBV?

Last edited by fightinphilz; 06-24-2020 at 07:12 AM..