Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Diversions > Bridge
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

DW Simpson & Co
Worldwide Actuarial

Recruitment

Entry Level Jobs
Casualty, Health,

Life, Pension,
Investment --
Insurance / Consulting

Asian Jobs
Hong Kong, China, India, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Singapore,

Malaysia, and more

Registration Form
Be Notified of

New Actuarial Jobs


Bridge Sub-Forums: Frequency and Severity

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2004, 11:26 PM
Numbers Nerd's Avatar
Numbers Nerd Numbers Nerd is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Midwest
Favorite beer: Ale, Lager, you name it
Posts: 1,092
Default Bridge Article: Forcing Notrump

The forcing notrump is a useful addition for those who play 5 card majors. Simply put, if you bid 1NT over partner’s opening bid of 1H or 1S, it is a forcing bid. Opener responds in a four card suit if he has one (but not 1H - 1NT - 2S, unless you have extra values - that is a reverse), otherwise bids his cheapest 3 card minor. Responder then clarifies his hand, such as by bidding a new suit (nonforcing), bidding 2NT to show a 10-11 point hand, or bidding 3 of openers major to show a 3-card limit raise.

Advantages

1. You can distiguish between a 3-card and a 4-card limit raise. A direct raise (1S - 3S) now promises 4 card support. Opener needs less to accept a 4-card limit raise (my rule is a 7 loser hand for a 4-card raise, but I need a 6-loser hand to accept a 3-card limit raise).

2. You can play in the weak hand’s long suit. Responder can now start with a forcing notrump if he has xx, xx, xx, KQxxxxx, and knows he will have a chance to bid 3C to play.

3. You avoid 1NT when the opponents have a long running suit. Often, you’ll play in opener’s suit in a 5-2 fit. But this is worth an extra trick versus 1NT at least 60% of the time.

Disadvantages

1. You can’t play 1NT when it’s right.

2. When opener rebids 2C, you don’t know if he has 3 or 4 cards. This is why you usually prefer to opener’s major, even when you have 4 clubs in support and a doubleton in partner’s major. Opener’s 2D rebid shows 4 cards more frequently, since the only time he has 3 is when his shape is specifically 5-3-3-2 or 4-5-3-1.

Other sequences

1S - 1NT - 2NT should show 18-19 HCP. With 16-17, bid 2 of your minor, then follow up with 2NT.

1S - 1NT - 2C - 2D - 2S should show extra values along with 6 spades and 4 clubs. With a minimum 6-4, opener should just rebid his suit.

1S - 1NT - 3NT This one is fun. Use it to show about 16-18 points and a solid 6-7 card major suit - sort of a semi-gambling bid. Responder may pass or correct.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2004, 06:53 PM
4sigma's Avatar
4sigma 4sigma is offline
95% confidence man
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Somewhere near the mean
College: Caltech Alumni
Favorite beer: root
Posts: 14,514
Default

Thanks for the tips about the rebids on the 6-4 hands. I was not familiar with those.

I have also seen 1NT played as "semi-forcing". Opener may pass the 1NT response with a minimum opener, i.e. if he would not accept a 3-card limit raise.

This lets you play 1NT sometimes when it is right. Also sometimes you stay at the 1-level when opener has a rather less-than-stellar opening bid.

Against that, you sometimes play 1NT when you should be in your major, or when the weak hand would prefer to sign off in its long suit.
__________________
I am 95% confident.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2004, 07:00 PM
John F. Kennedy's Avatar
John F. Kennedy John F. Kennedy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,344
Default

Roth introduced the forcing notrump, and K-S adopted it, but for different reasons.

In the Roth world, the forcing notrump differentiates game-going hands from other hands, and K-S uses the forcing notrump because theory suggests that when opener has a five-card major, notrump is usually the wrong strain (current belief is that it's right 30% of the time).
__________________
"... The overarching goal I’ve set for myself in my scholarship, though, is gradually to lessen my reliance on the theories of others. Instead, I want to become a learned person—that is, I want to be one of those scholars who has read so deeply and widely, and who has such a comprehensive grasp of the time and circumstances that surround whatever I’m writing about, that my conclusions carry a weight of indisputability that mere theoretical coherence can’t give them." -- Anonymous English Chair, during an employment interview.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.31980 seconds with 7 queries