Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA > Exam DP - Design and Pricing
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Bengaluru - Chennai - Hyderabad - Pune
Actuarial Jobs in India
New Delhi - Mumbai - Gurgaon


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-31-2002, 03:46 PM
CDL CDL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 34
Default C7 June Seminar Questions

Two questions about Case Study 4:

1. Can someone please give me a better explanation of the variable ASSUME? What exactly does per occurrence retention mean? My only guesses are either it has to do with reinsurance or retention of policies (i.e., low lapses = higher retention)

2. In Exercise 3, when I try to create a histogram of FIRMCOST, Excel gives me an error which says "Histogram - Input Range must be contiguous", without any further explanation.

I followed the Appendix steps to create the histogram of the standardized residuals and when I did the exact same with FIRMCOST, I get the error. What am I doing wrong? Is the question supposed to be "create a histogram of the Predicted FIRMCOST Residuals", because that works.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-03-2002, 09:27 AM
RedDog RedDog is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 19
Default Case Study 4

1. Not exactly sure what ASSUME means, but I don't think it's a very significant contributor to the total cost/risk. I believe it's referring to the expenses and admin related to selling insurance, which are usually fairly constant.

2. The contiguous input range is weird. But I think I got the same thing. Basically, the numbers just have to be right next to each other (Columns A & B works, Columns A & D won't work). Odd, but true I believe.

Can anyone help me out with the Extended Case Study? I see solutions for the exercises, but they don't really show their work and I'm lost.

Together, we can beat the hell out of this "exam."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2002, 09:04 PM
yeppers-wsmn yeppers-wsmn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 446
Default

What are you doing for CS8?

Anyone else have trouble reproducing the graph at the bottom of page 9 of 11? This must be a function in Excel 2000, I'm using 97 (which is the recommended software). My excel has pivot tables, but not pivot charts.

Are you guys/gals updating the 9/30/1997 report or starting one from scratch?

Are we going to be graded on this?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2002, 08:36 AM
A Student A Student is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,637
Default

Hello,

I'm using the .DOT template to pretty much redo the 1997 report, but my report will be very similar to the 1997. I don't think we're graded on this, so I'm just shooting for ball park reasonable to get a feel for the work.

Speaking of these case studies, how much time has everybody been putting into them? They're not graded, and looking at the sample project, I'm not sure how much they will help out in the graded project. Besides, I've just started, so only have a weekend left!
Thanks....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2002, 09:19 AM
Me Me is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ? is, where am I going
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yeppers
Anyone else have trouble reproducing the graph at the bottom of page 9 of 11? This must be a function in Excel 2000, I'm using 97 (which is the recommended software). My excel has pivot tables, but not pivot charts.
First of all, I can't believe they haven't changed CS8 to reflect its writer's stupidity. I asked about this one when I took 7. After getting a little run around, I found out that the person who wrote CS8 was using Excel 2000 and using functions we don't have in 97, despite the fact that 97 is the recommended software. You figured correctly. I did not use pivot tables or charts in my actual course 7. If anything like that would be useful, you are allowed (even during the project) to ask for help with technical things like that and they will give it.

Quote:
Are we going to be graded on this?
No.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2002, 09:28 AM
Sancho Sancho is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 14
Default

Is anyone updating the operating profit projections to account for the higher lapse rates?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2002, 10:20 AM
Phil's Avatar
Phil Phil is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: not on board the Enterprise
Posts: 5,664
Default

Does the project itself relate to the Extended Case Study more than it does to any of the core case studies? Or is it totally random?

Thks,
-Phil
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2002, 11:30 AM
Me Me is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ? is, where am I going
Posts: 1,001
Default

Unless there has been a recent change in policy, the project is based directly on an extension of the extended case study. It does not necessarily have any relation to the core case ctudies.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-14-2002, 06:32 PM
JO JO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 873
Default

Was doing all this crap prior to the seminar necessary? No.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.37230 seconds with 7 queries