Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 2/FM - Financial Mathematics
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet KC Cho, DW Simpson Partner

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2005, 10:25 AM
BL BL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 190
Default Theory

Do you think it is necessary to solve the theory type questions such as Broverman's text question 1.3.9? Or questions that say ‘show that’ or derivation of formulas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2005, 11:14 AM
Trelf Trelf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 31
Default To an extent

Well, to an extent doing questions like that is valuable as it gets you familair with the formulas and definitions...however, personally, I do not plan on spending much time doing theory questions.

My studying is focussing on knowing the concepts, doing all the questions from past exams I can get my hands on, and being able to set up problems correctly from first principles without relying on formulas.

The number of questions that don't involve a numeric answer on the exam I don't expect to be more than a few.
__________________
Stupid is as stupid does
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2005, 10:11 PM
louisdj_KSU louisdj_KSU is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 257
Default

What Trelf said is good advice.

Assuming the questions don't change much from last year's structure, the questions are mainly numerical in nature, requiring you to 'translate' the terms into a numerical structure (time-flow diagram), recognize the appropriate equation or calculator function for the structure, and get the calculator to spit out the right number. Hence, as far as the test itself goes, I would recommend more number problems than theory problems. After all, no one can't put "Prove that A=B." in multiple choice format, not even the SOA, despite how hard they try.

Having said that, their attempts might include questions like "Which of the following has the highest yield rate?" and list for example A) 10 year, $1000 bond with 8% coupons, B) 10 year annuity due with $100 payments, C) 5 year annuity due with $200 payments, D) 10 year annuity immediate with $100 payments, E) 5 year annuity immediate with $200 payments. Last Nov, one of the questions listed a timeline with payments made and payments received, but no amounts, just whether they paid you or you paid them. The question asked for the maximum number of yield rates possible, referring to Descarte's Rule of Signs. So yes, SOA has their way of working around the fact that you cannot write proofs for them, to some degree. However, these type problems have made up about 25% of the interest theory part, where the other 75% ask you to find a numeric value for a variable. From reading the study guide, I'll be curious as to whether they have some questions that just involve definitions, like "Which fromula gives you the time-weighted interest rate?" personally.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.11855 seconds with 7 queries