Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs
Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-07-2005, 10:52 PM
Sox34's Avatar
Sox34 Sox34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,147
Default test for given survival functions

So, if a function is given and we're asked to see if it can serve as a force of mortality, the tests are
1. must always be positive, (although not necessarily increasing which was key for last fall's CAS exam)
2. the integral from 0 to infinity of the function must equal infinity

What are the corresponding tests if a function is given and we need to test if it can serve as a survival function?
1. must be [0,1]
some of the other things I've thought of do not work for certain mortality laws.
Anyone know the general rules?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-07-2005, 10:55 PM
Sox34's Avatar
Sox34 Sox34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,147
Default

I think I have written down somewhere that s(x) has to be increasing although I do not know if that makes sense to me...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2005, 11:15 PM
wat?'s Avatar
wat? wat? is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hi
Studying for FRM Exam
Posts: 27,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox34
I think I have written down somewhere that s(x) has to be increasing although I do not know if that makes sense to me...
  • s(x) must be non-increasing. [You can't have a better chance of survival as you get older. (Well, not theoretically - there is the anomaly of newborns.)]
  • s(0) = 1
  • lim (x-->inf) s(x) = 0
  • s(x) is right-continuous
__________________
"Mathematical Induction: How mathematicians manage to suck all the fun out of lining up a row of dominos, knocking the one on the end down, and watching the entire row fall." -BC
Skip it. - AG

Because everything should taste like bacon.
AO Golfers Unite! Here and here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-07-2005, 11:17 PM
Sox34's Avatar
Sox34 Sox34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wat?
[list][*]s(x) must be non-increasing. [You can't have a better chance of survival as you get older. (Well, not theoretically - there is the anomaly of newborns.)]
yeah i must have had a brainfart when i wrote that down. thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2005, 07:22 AM
TwinsFan1987's Avatar
TwinsFan1987 TwinsFan1987 is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago
Studying for FSModules/waiting for APM
College: Northwestern College (IA) alumnus
Posts: 676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wat?
  • s(x) must be non-increasing. [You can't have a better chance of survival as you get older. (Well, not theoretically - there is the anomaly of newborns.)]
Actually, the condition doesn't mean that you have a lesser chance of dying as you get older. Many real-life mortality tables account for the high infant mortality rate but still have decreasing survival functions.

What the decreasing (actually non-increasing) survival function means is that no one can be added to the pool - once you die, you're out. If the survival function is level over a time period, then that means that no one dies during that period.

I hope that this helps.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
...make it your ambition to lead a quiet life and attend to your own business and work with your hands
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2005, 09:42 AM
wat?'s Avatar
wat? wat? is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hi
Studying for FRM Exam
Posts: 27,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinsFan1987
Actually, the condition doesn't mean that you have a lesser chance of dying as you get older. Many real-life mortality tables account for the high infant mortality rate but still have decreasing survival functions.

What the decreasing (actually non-increasing) survival function means is that no one can be added to the pool - once you die, you're out. If the survival function is level over a time period, then that means that no one dies during that period.

I hope that this helps.
Thanks. My mistake that I didn't check it too carefully - was on my way out of the office.
__________________
"Mathematical Induction: How mathematicians manage to suck all the fun out of lining up a row of dominos, knocking the one on the end down, and watching the entire row fall." -BC
Skip it. - AG

Because everything should taste like bacon.
AO Golfers Unite! Here and here.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.15302 seconds with 7 queries