Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 1/P - Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

CANADIAN ACTUARIAL JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2002, 04:29 PM
wspol00 wspol00 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4
Default Enough time for exam 1???

I have a question, i just ordered averbach&Mehta study Guide and actex one pack. I have some calculus background and just a little probability background. Will i have enough time to study for and pass the exam in NOV. ??? how many questions do i have to get right in order to pass??

thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2002, 04:43 PM
PsychMajor PsychMajor is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10
Default

I've always heard the rough guideline for the pass mark is 60% or 24 out of 40 questions. Of course that is only a guideline. 7 weeks seems like enough time to pass the exam if you have a good math background. Keep in mind that the exam registration deadline is Sept 24, 2002.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2002, 04:45 PM
Alya Alya is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 213
Default Re: Enough time for exam 1???

Quote:
Originally Posted by wspol00
how many questions do i have to get right in order to pass??
about 75% at home, 65% on the actual exam.

Weather or not you have enough time depends on what your "some calculus background and just a little probability background" really is. Take any old exam and try to do it. If you can get 1/3 right, have no clue about another 1/3, and can easily understand solution (but missed something in the formula) to the rest, you have a good chance.

Otherwise, start studying for the May'03.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2002, 06:22 PM
GenkiGirl GenkiGirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TO
Posts: 1,773
Default

I think you have enough time if you get you but in gear. I studied for 5 weeks at 3-5 hours a day (minus weekends) and passed with room to spare. But...I had a degree in math so had done lots of calculus and didn't even know where to start on the Probablity.

When I took the test before reading the book I was getting 11 or so. After I did the book I would average in the 30's. When I did the test I only didn't know how to do 2 questions and walked out with a 10.. BUT I had very little life for 5 weeks..and I was lucky enough to study dureing my free time at work..

Good luck....

it's better to try, fail and get a better understanding of what you are doing than to wait until the next one (my opinion)
__________________
-----------------
la la la la la la
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2002, 08:17 PM
c3 taker c3 taker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 137
Default

Even with only a slight math background I would definately say you have enough time as you long as you have the time to put in a few hours a day and really crack down come October. Especially with the Temple manual....that is a great study guide!

Good luck!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2002, 09:40 AM
Nanae7 Nanae7 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: tha dirty South
Posts: 116
Default

I say take it regardless. Taking the actual exam is great experience. If you do happen to fail, you'll know what to work harder on for may plus it'll help for may because you've already been through it once recently. good luck to ya! I'll be taking it with you for the 3rd and final time. The first time I took it, I only studied a month and had hardly any probability experience. But I was glad I had taken it anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2002, 10:14 AM
New at pd New at pd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 560
Default

I studied for 6 weeks to take exams 100 and 110 (the predecessors of Course 1), and passed both -- it can be done.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-13-2002, 01:54 PM
wspol00 wspol00 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4
Default

thanks for the reply guys,

im gonna go for it. As some of you said even if i fail it will be a good experience for me. And even if i fail i think i still have time to try again. I'm 20years old. I had calc. in H.S. and now i finished my Calc. Requirements in college. Im trying to take it to see how it is. I love math and calculus and so far the small amount of probability that i had in college i liked to, so thats why i thought i might give it a chance. I thought why wait till may when i could try in Nov. and see how it is. Well as soon as my books come im starting! It is going to be kind of difficult for me, because currently i have work 38hrs per week and have full time School(and now with studying for this test = no life for now . ), but im determined and i will try my best. So wish me luck guys!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-13-2002, 02:00 PM
New at pd New at pd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 560
Default

I wish I could give you about 6 more hours each day. Until then, all I can do is wish you good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-13-2002, 02:17 PM
jerrytuttle jerrytuttle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Platinum Underwriters Re
Posts: 197
Default Late start in studying

I want to repeat what one of the older posts said: Take one of the sample exams, and see how well you can do. Either you can do a fair amount of questions, even after checking the answers, or you can't. If you can't, then maybe you can't cram for this exam injust a few weeks.

Keep in mind that the first exam requires that you know a little insurance terminology, and there is a specifc reading on the syllabus for that.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.38287 seconds with 7 queries