Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA > Exam CSP - Company/Sponsor Perspective
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Fill in a brief DW Simpson Registration Form
to be contacted when our jobs meet your criteria.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2005, 02:01 PM
SSS SSS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 62
Default Duration of Swaps - PRM Exam

Can anyone explain how the durations 4.36 and 7.66 are calculated in this question from a PRM practice exam?


A trader executes a $200 million 5-year pay fixed swap with one client and a $100 million 10-year receive fixed swap with another client shortly afterwards. Assuming that the 5-year rate is 4.75 percent and 10-year rate is 5.15 percent and that all contracts are transacted at par, how can the trader hedge his net delta position?


a.Sell 424 Eurodollar contracts.

b.Buy 424 Eurodollar contracts.

c.Sell 6,552 Eurodollar contracts.

d.Buy 6,552 Eurodollar contracts.

Answer B

Explanation:

Given the rates of 4.75% and 5.15%, the dollar durations of the 5-year and 10-year par swaps are approximately 4.36 and 7.66. Therefore, the trader has the following DVBP positions
First swap DVBP = $200 million x 4.36 x 0.0001 = $87,200.
Second swap DVBP = $100 million x 7.66 x 0.0001 = $-76,600.
Net DVBP position = 87,200 + -76,600 = 10,600.

Since the trader has a short position, he needs to buy the futures. The DVBP or a Eurodollar future is $25. Therefore the number of contracts required = 10,600 / 25 = 424.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2005, 02:10 PM
WWSituation's Avatar
WWSituation WWSituation is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: philadelphia, pa
Favorite beer: Parabola
Posts: 2,836
Default

It looks like the explanation is using a rule of thumb. You can do the same by looking at the swaps as 5 and 7 year bonds and estimating the durations off your calculator.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffer View Post
We, the actuarial profession, did several things badly.

1. Pandering - we marketed ourselves as finding clever ways to give the public pension sponsors something for nothing
2. Ignored consequences - we found clever ways to allow politicians to ignore the true costs of benefit increases, like negative amortization of losses
3. Low standards of measurement - GASB had the most simple-minded of standards, and is now only going half-way to raise the standard.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2005, 02:26 PM
SSS SSS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 62
Default

Thanks! That helps, I didn't think to treat the swaps as bonds
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2005, 02:58 PM
WWSituation's Avatar
WWSituation WWSituation is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: philadelphia, pa
Favorite beer: Parabola
Posts: 2,836
Default

Curious: What is your regiment for the PRM exams?

I ask because I'm taking the FRM in November and I wonder if they aren't close to the same curriculum. It would be hard to believe that the material could be drasticaly different.

Do you take all of the modules in 1 shot?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffer View Post
We, the actuarial profession, did several things badly.

1. Pandering - we marketed ourselves as finding clever ways to give the public pension sponsors something for nothing
2. Ignored consequences - we found clever ways to allow politicians to ignore the true costs of benefit increases, like negative amortization of losses
3. Low standards of measurement - GASB had the most simple-minded of standards, and is now only going half-way to raise the standard.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2005, 03:45 PM
SSS SSS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 62
Default

My plan is to take the 4 exams separately... just because it's easier to study one at a time.
To prepare I'm reading the Handbook that the PRM publishes. It's a lot of reading and it's hard to know what to focus on. I'm just hoping that the practice exams are a good indication of what to expect.
The PRM exams are offered all the time, so you can chose when to take each exam.

From what I've heard, the FRM syllabus is very similar. Is it just one exam? Did they provide reading material?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-2005, 04:00 PM
WWSituation's Avatar
WWSituation WWSituation is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: philadelphia, pa
Favorite beer: Parabola
Posts: 2,836
Default

The FRM exam is one exam. They provide readings but the big plus is that Schweser put together a study manual, and I had good success with Schweser for the CFA exams.

Best of luck to you.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffer View Post
We, the actuarial profession, did several things badly.

1. Pandering - we marketed ourselves as finding clever ways to give the public pension sponsors something for nothing
2. Ignored consequences - we found clever ways to allow politicians to ignore the true costs of benefit increases, like negative amortization of losses
3. Low standards of measurement - GASB had the most simple-minded of standards, and is now only going half-way to raise the standard.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.39124 seconds with 7 queries