Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Diversions > Bridge
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

CANADIAN ACTUARIAL JOBS

Bridge Sub-Forums: Frequency and Severity

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2005, 11:19 AM
Klaymen's Avatar
Klaymen Klaymen is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bridge tournament
Studying for Silodor Pairs, SQL Server
Posts: 11,607
Default Try this one

IMPS, White vs red.
Partner opens 1, RHO bids 2 Michaels, and I pass with:
-
Txxxx
Txxx
KTxx

LHO bids 2 Partner bids 3, Now 4 by RHO and I bid 5.

That would have been nice but LHO pushes to 5 and partner doubles - back to you...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2005, 11:40 AM
MNBridge's Avatar
MNBridge MNBridge is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,377
Default

I pass.
__________________
Looks like the parastie is going to have to find another life to go after.

He sucked all the enjoyment of visting this place out of me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2005, 11:56 AM
Sandman's Avatar
Sandman Sandman is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A bridge table near you
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MNBridge
I pass.
Me too.
__________________
Great minds think alike, but feeble minds seldom differ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2005, 12:12 PM
Klaymen's Avatar
Klaymen Klaymen is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bridge tournament
Studying for Silodor Pairs, SQL Server
Posts: 11,607
Default

I upped the ante to 6 and it got whacked.

Partner's hand:
xxxx
-
AKx
AQJxxx

Partner was able to ruff out all the major cards, take two diamonds, and clear trump at the end, making 6 for +1090 and 7 IMPs.

RHO held AKJxx in the majors and LHO had the missing Q's and minor cards and was 4 spades 3 hearts.

5 will always go down two, losing three minor tricks and I think a heart. If I lead out a heart and partner tries me for the K entry it's down 3.
__________________

Last edited by Klaymen; 10-31-2005 at 12:50 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2005, 12:32 PM
E. Blackadder's Avatar
E. Blackadder E. Blackadder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Not far from US 1.
Favorite beer: Beer?! Blech. But Dad likes Dortmunder Union.
Posts: 20,778
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Brown
IMPS, White vs red.
Partner opens 1, RHO bids 2 Michaels, and I pass with:
-
Txxxx
Txxx
KTxx

LHO bids 2 Partner bids 3, Now 4 by RHO and I bid 5.

That would have been nice but LHO pushes to 5 and partner doubles - back to you...
1: Bid 3C at your first turn; at worst you're on a 4-2 fit.

2: Right or wrong, trust your partner, unless your hand is vastly different from what he'd expect. In that case, ask yourself why your hand is so different from what he'd expect.
__________________
If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination. Once begun upon this downward path, you never know where you are to stop. Many a man has dated his ruin from some murder or other that perhaps he thought little of
at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2005, 12:42 PM
Numbers Nerd's Avatar
Numbers Nerd Numbers Nerd is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Midwest
Favorite beer: Ale, Lager, you name it
Posts: 1,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E. Blackadder
1: Bid 3C at your first turn; at worst you're on a 4-2 fit.

2: Right or wrong, trust your partner, unless your hand is vastly different from what he'd expect. In that case, ask yourself why your hand is so different from what he'd expect.
I too would have bid 3C. I would have passed the double of 5S. But partner should not double 5S! Look at that hand for offense! He knows his partner is VERY short in spades, so 6C should be at worst 50%, while 5S is quite possibly laydown. Terrible double - he should be the one bidding 6C.

But, in hindsight, a club lead toilets 6C (unless clubs 1-1 and diamonds 3-3), and 5S goes down. Go figure. Still, that 6C bid is simply taking out insurance - the old fallback position of bidding one more, just in case.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2005, 12:50 PM
E. Blackadder's Avatar
E. Blackadder E. Blackadder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Not far from US 1.
Favorite beer: Beer?! Blech. But Dad likes Dortmunder Union.
Posts: 20,778
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Numbers Nerd
But partner should not double 5S! Look at that hand for offense! He knows his partner is VERY short in spades, so 6C should be at worst 50%, while 5S is quite possibly laydown. Terrible double - he should be the one bidding 6C.
Correct as it may be in this case, with a partner like that, you either help him develop -- or walk. Don't add to partner's troubles by teaching him bad habits such as pulling penalty doubles.
__________________
If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination. Once begun upon this downward path, you never know where you are to stop. Many a man has dated his ruin from some murder or other that perhaps he thought little of
at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2005, 12:55 PM
Klaymen's Avatar
Klaymen Klaymen is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bridge tournament
Studying for Silodor Pairs, SQL Server
Posts: 11,607
Default

I had to edit the hand - pard only had 6 clubs. I prefer to pass here, 3 could be interpreted as actually having anything useful.

Funny, Edmund. With or without the short club, I almost never raise without 5. One of my pet peeves is opening a minor and having people bid it up on 4 cards of their own. Sure, compete to 2 if you have some distribution, otherwise give it a rest. Do you really want to bid 3 and find pard with:

QJxx
Kxx
Qxx
Axx
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-31-2005, 12:57 PM
Klaymen's Avatar
Klaymen Klaymen is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bridge tournament
Studying for Silodor Pairs, SQL Server
Posts: 11,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E. Blackadder
Correct as it may be in this case, with a partner like that, you either help him develop -- or walk. Don't add to partner's troubles by teaching him bad habits such as pulling penalty doubles.
You can't be right; this man was an expert.

Actually my track record on pulling penalty doubles is pretty good. Don't know if that's something I should brag about but hey
__________________

Last edited by Klaymen; 10-31-2005 at 01:00 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-31-2005, 01:14 PM
Klaymen's Avatar
Klaymen Klaymen is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bridge tournament
Studying for Silodor Pairs, SQL Server
Posts: 11,607
Default

Had two tourney first overalls on consecutive nights this week. On one IMP game against an expert and a world class (which is 50% of the time a truly good player or this 50% of the time even crazier than an expert):

Board 1, vul vs non pard 2 3 by RHO.

I bid to 4 with
xxx
xxx
AKQJx
KJ

LHO 5 which I double. I score both trumps as declarer finesse, some diamond and I think I got pard's major card and more, down 800; 4 doesn't even make.

Board 2, both vul. Pard doubles LHO's 1 and my hand sucks I bid 2 LHO bids 2 and pard doubles again, redouble, I pass, 2NT by pard. World class RHO doubles and I can't remember if we got an overtrick or not.

+24 was a nice start.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.24485 seconds with 7 queries