Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models > CAS 3 - specific material
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

ACTUARIAL SALARY SURVEYS

CAS 3 - specific material Please keep posts regarding material common to both exams in the upper forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:22 AM
ActingActuary ActingActuary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Smile #3 Power of the Test

Did anyoen happen to answer this question? If so, what was your answer?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:24 AM
azaremba azaremba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 95
Default

I am pretty sure I got 61 so the 60-80 range. I actually got confused between two ways... both got me to that range which was a huge sign... anyone else agree with this?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:28 AM
sticks1839 sticks1839 is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,138
Default

I think I got 59, just below the 60-80 range. I'm not sure if I found the correct C value for the test though because of it being a poisson.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:28 AM
ActingActuary ActingActuary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Default

I had B.

I'm not saying this is right, but this is how I did it.
I determined that the critical region was X>2, by finding that Pr (X>2|lambda = 1) < .1 (X has to be an integer becasue it's a single observation from a discrete distribution)

Then Power = 1 - Pr (Type II error) then Pr (Type II error) = (Pr H0 not rejected | H0 false) = Pr (X<2 | lambda = 2) = .672, but then the power would be 1-.672-.323

OR you could just say Power = Probability H0 is rejected given that it's false which is
Pr (X>2 | lambda =2 ) =.323

Last edited by ActingActuary; 11-02-2005 at 10:31 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:33 AM
sticks1839 sticks1839 is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,138
Default

I did it the same way but because the question said significance level of "at least" 10%, I made the critical region was X>1. The rest was the same and that gave me the .59 or so answer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:34 AM
azaremba azaremba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 95
Default

I was in the notion that what you solved is the Power, and then taking 1- the .672 value would be the type 2 error... that is the way I learned it from Mahler. It looks like we did the same method, we just used the opposite values for Power.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:35 AM
ActingActuary ActingActuary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgibson18
I did it the same way but because the question said significance level of "at least" 10%, I made the critical region was X>1. The rest was the same and that gave me the .59 or so answer.

I have the exam in front of me, and it doesn't say "at least 10%" it says "10%" . I'm not sure if that changes your opinion, but I thougth I would tell you.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:52 AM
MrsFrog's Avatar
MrsFrog MrsFrog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Studying for NOT Cas 7
Favorite beer: On Tap
Posts: 4,150
Default

I got .59, but I thought the critical region was X>= 2. I don't have the test in front of me, so I can't tell you why I did this
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2005, 08:26 PM
Turkey Club Turkey Club is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Studying for CAS Exam 9
Favorite beer: Corona
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsFrog
I got .59, but I thought the critical region was X>= 2. I don't have the test in front of me, so I can't tell you why I did this
I got 76%, so an answer of D: 60 to 80%

I got the same .323 answer but thought the power was the other way: 1- .323 or soemthing.

Actually I got a Z a little over 5 which leads to a power right around .700. Were you guys using an integer as your K? I had my K set to 3 since that was the next integer higher than 2.282.

I wasn't sure if that was what we were supposed to do or not

Last edited by Turkey Club; 11-02-2005 at 08:48 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-02-2005, 08:55 PM
ActingActuary ActingActuary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turkey Club
I got 76%, so an answer of D: 60 to 80%

I got the same .323 answer but thought the power was the other way: 1- .323 or soemthing.

Actually I got a Z a little over 5 which leads to a power right around .700. Were you guys using an integer as your K? I had my K set to 3 since that was the next integer higher than 2.282.

I wasn't sure if that was what we were supposed to do or not
Yes I used an integer, but I had .323 (not 1-.323). Using K >=3 or K>2 (same thing because we are dealing with integers)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.28900 seconds with 7 queries