What a crappy looking transcript.

[RedEye (Banned)]

Originally Posted by LanaJane

they used to give feedback, but ONLY if you failed. So they figure if you passed, who cares how you did on each topic. Now that it only covers probability, they no longer give feedback.

When was this?

[Mathsucks]

Originally Posted by Bulb-O

More importantly where is the feedback? They just tell us the number, how about letting us know a little more about the topics we performed well on or need to improve. I hear they previously gave feedback on broad topics such as probability vs. calculus, but it would be nice to know a little more about the score than just a raw number...Lame....

Even with the raw number that they give I don't know my score. Why can't they say I got 18/30 etc. Just seems strange to me. Or if it would jepordize the strength of the exam just say so and tell me why, don't hide it.

[Hokus]

Originally Posted by Mathsucks

Even with the raw number that they give I don't know my score. Why can't they say I got 18/30 etc. Just seems strange to me. Or if it would jepordize the strength of the exam just say so and tell me why, don't hide it.

yeah I don't understand this either. Especially since they are moving in that direction anyway. i.e. eventually the CBT will give you your raw score.

[thenumberE]

An effective/non-effective indication would even be nice, but that would probably make it a bit easier to guess the pass mark.

[Jen12]

If your score was zero, you were ineffective. If your score was 1-10, you were effective.

[Mathsucks]

Originally Posted by robertr24

An effective/non-effective indication would even be nice, but that would probably make it a bit easier to guess the pass mark.

you mean guess what the pass mark for that sitting was. I wish they could tell us why they cannot be transparent with the stuff. (If there is a thread explaining why please point me to it)