Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 3/MLC - Actuarial Models
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:10 PM
MyKenk's Avatar
MyKenk MyKenk is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: http://mhenk.blogspot.com
Studying for CAS 9/8/whatever?
College: Drake '06
Posts: 8,519
Default "Adjusting" A compound Negative Binomial Distribution

Hey guys. I have the following as a homework problem, and I know the general idea of what I need to do, but I'm having some trouble, so any help would be greatly appreciated:

After imposing a deductible, claim amounts are:
0 with prob .6
1 with prob .2
2 with prob .2

PRIOR to imposing the deductive, (N) number of losses are from a negative binomial distribution, r=2, beta=2.

I need to find aggregate probabilites for S...

I have already done this when N (number of claims) was a poission distribution, and that involved adjusting lambda and the claim amount probabilities, so I'm assuming there's something similar I can do with the negative binomial, but I can't seem to figure out how to adjust the number of claims distribution.

I would like to be able to use the recursive formula derived in section 12.4 of bowers, that's what I did with the poisson, but I know that that recursion does not work when the claim amounts distribution places probability at zero, so naturally, an adjustment came to mine.

Again, any help would be terrific.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2005, 10:46 PM
sam_broverman sam_broverman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 638
Default

The adjusted claims distribution will be negative
binomial with the same r = 2, but an adjusted beta.
The adjusted beta is the original beta multiplied
by the probability that the original loss is above the deductible
(that prob. is .4 in this case), so the adjusted beta is .8 .
Then aggregate payments S (after deductible) has
a compound distribution with neg binomial frequency
with r = 2 and beta = .8 and a severity distribution which
is the conditional distribution of X-d given X>d .
From the way you have described things, it
looks like this conditional dist is a two-point distwith outcomes
1 (prob. .5) and 2 (prob. .5) .
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-04-2005, 11:30 PM
MyKenk's Avatar
MyKenk MyKenk is offline
Note Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: http://mhenk.blogspot.com
Studying for CAS 9/8/whatever?
College: Drake '06
Posts: 8,519
Default

awesome... thanks a lot.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.13986 seconds with 7 queries