Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > Exams - General
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Fill in a brief DW Simpson Registration Form
to be contacted when our jobs meet your criteria.


Exams - General Sub-fora: CFA exams
Non-specific topics and complaint department

View Poll Results: How would you like to see the Course 5-8 + PD exam thread split up?
Split out all exams including the different 8's and split out PD 4 11.11%
Same as above except combine all C8's 3 8.33%
Course 5, Course 6, Course 7, Course 8 +PD 3 8.33%
Course 5, Course 6, Courses 7-8 +PD 3 8.33%
Courses 5-6, Courses 7-8 +PD 9 25.00%
Courses 5-7, Course 8 +PD 3 8.33%
Keep them all lumped together 11 30.56%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2002, 01:12 PM
Brad Spirrison Brad Spirrison is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LPTS
Posts: 702
Default Splitting Up Exam Threads

Based on Total Volume It seems that Courses 5-8 + PD has about 80% of the traffic of the combined C1-4 threads.

Just want to lobby for splitting up 5-8 plus PD.

What reasons are there for not doing this in light of the fragmentation of Courses 1-4?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2002, 01:28 PM
Traci's Avatar
Traci Traci is offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,486
Default

Because I just haven't done it yet.

Any more questions?





Besides DTNF is still tired from separating out 1-4. I'm letting him rest a bit before I make him get back to work!

When I do split them, I'm leaning toward 5-6, 7-8+PD.
__________________
Hakuna Matada
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2002, 01:43 PM
glenn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Traci, I think your proposed split is the best breakdown.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2002, 01:54 PM
Dr T Non-Fan Dr T Non-Fan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Just outside of Nowhere
Posts: 59,063
Default

One improvement might be for folks to be able to minimize the exam fora. I see that when I click a super-category, the other threads minimize.

Or, move the exam fora below non-actuarial, so those not taking exams don't have to scroll by them on their way to their interests.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2002, 02:56 PM
Traci's Avatar
Traci Traci is offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,486
Default

Now don't be getting the idea that YOU get to have a say!
__________________
Hakuna Matada
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2002, 03:39 PM
Dr T Non-Fan Dr T Non-Fan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Just outside of Nowhere
Posts: 59,063
Default

I have a say, and you can ignore me. That's the American way.

It's just an idea.
It's not a "Proven to be a more effective discussion board format."



Yet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2002, 07:42 PM
Traci's Avatar
Traci Traci is offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,486
Default

Don't you have more work to do?
__________________
Hakuna Matada
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-14-2002, 08:25 PM
Dr T Non-Fan Dr T Non-Fan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Just outside of Nowhere
Posts: 59,063
Default

Ay, captain. 100 down, about, oh, 400 to go.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2002, 10:35 PM
Effa's Avatar
Effa Effa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: One Nation, Under Canada
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan
I have a say, and you can ignore me. That's the American way.
Doesn't apply then. This site is located in Canadian web space!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2002, 11:31 PM
glenn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ed!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.23464 seconds with 8 queries