Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet the Employees of DW Simpson
Patty Jacobsen Simpson, Bob Morand, Kristyn Sakelaris, Sean Loboda, KC Cho, Maureen Matous, Ellen Page
Aaron Benton, Becki Tobia, Kimberly Skora, Margit Vogele, Barclay Burns, Jason Blundy, Dan Karrow, Tom Troceen
Valorie Mulder, Marianne Westphal, Carol Lee, Jennifer Retford, Kieran Welsh-Phillips, Lindsey Nelson, Emily Paxton
Angie Wachholz, Derek Mulder, Julie Garwood, Caitlin Cunningham, David Benton, Dave Retford, Sarah Cleveland, Rhonda Glick
Genevieve Shannon, Meghan Bautista, Carol Datu, Barb Rave, Jesus Perez, Dan Kane, Chris Zdenek, Scott Simon, Kriss Wells


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-23-2006, 12:03 AM
2pac Shakur's Avatar
2pac Shakur 2pac Shakur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: short
Posts: 73,280
Default Bush Didn't Bungle Iraq, You Fools

Quote:
Get off it. All the carping, belly-aching and complaining about George Bush's incompetence in Iraq, from both the Left and now the Right, is just dead wrong.

On the third anniversary of the tanks rolling over Iraq's border, most of the 59 million Homer Simpsons who voted for Bush are beginning to doubt if his mission was accomplished.

But don't kid yourself -- Bush and his co-conspirator, Dick Cheney, accomplished exactly what they set out to do. In case you've forgotten what their real mission was, let me remind you of White House spokesman Ari Fleisher's original announcement, three years ago, launching of what he called,

"Operation
Iraqi
Liberation."

O.I.L. How droll of them, how cute. Then, Karl Rove made the giggling boys in the White House change it to "OIF" -- Operation Iraqi Freedom. But the 101st Airborne wasn't sent to Basra to get its hands on Iraq's OIF.

"It's about oil," Robert Ebel told me. Who is Ebel? Formerly the CIA's top oil analyst, he was sent by the Pentagon, about a month before the invasion, to a secret confab in London with Saddam's former oil minister to finalize the plans for "liberating" Iraq's oil industry. In London, Bush's emissary Ebel also instructed Ibrahim Bahr al-Ulum, the man the Pentagon would choose as post-OIF oil minister for Iraq, on the correct method of disposing Iraq's crude.

And what did the USA want Iraq to do with Iraq's oil? The answer will surprise many of you: and it is uglier, more twisted, devilish and devious than anything imagined by the most conspiracy-addicted blogger. The answer can be found in a 323-page plan for Iraq's oil secretly drafted by the State Department. Our team got a hold of a copy; how, doesn't matter. The key thing is what's inside this thick Bush diktat: a directive to Iraqis to maintain a state oil company that will "enhance its relationship with OPEC."

Enhance its relationship with OPEC??? How strange: the government of the United States ordering Iraq to support the very OPEC oil cartel which is strangling our nation with outrageously high prices for crude.

Specifically, the system ordered up by the Bush cabal would keep a lid on Iraq's oil production -- limiting Iraq's oil pumping to the tight quota set by Saudi Arabia and the OPEC cartel.

There you have it. Yes, Bush went in for the oil -- not to get MORE of Iraq's oil, but to prevent Iraq producing TOO MUCH of it.
You must keep in mind who paid for George's ranch and Dick's bunker: Big Oil. And Big Oil -- and their buck-buddies, the Saudis -- don't make money from pumping more oil, but from pumping LESS of it. The lower the supply, the higher the price.

It's Economics 101. The oil industry is run by a cartel, OPEC, and what economists call an "oligopoly" -- a tiny handful of operators who make more money when there's less oil, not more of it. So, every time the "insurgents" blow up a pipeline in Basra, every time Mad Mahmoud in Tehran threatens to cut supply, the price of oil leaps. And Dick and George just LOVE it.

Dick and George didn't want more oil from Iraq, they wanted less. I know some of you, no matter what I write, insist that our President and his Veep are on the hunt for more crude so you can cheaply fill your family Hummer; that somehow, these two oil-patch babies are concerned that the price of gas in the USA is bumping up to $3 a gallon.

No so, gentle souls. Three bucks a gallon in the States (and a quid a litre in Britain) means colossal profits for Big Oil, and that makes Dick's ticker go pitty-pat with joy. The top oily-gopolists, the five largest oil companies, pulled in $113 billion in profit in 2005 -- compared to a piddly $34 billion in 2002 before Operation Iraqi Liberation. In other words, it's been a good war for Big Oil.

As per Plan Bush, Bahr Al-Ulum became Iraq's occupation oil minister; the conquered nation "enhanced its relationship with OPEC;" and the price of oil, from Clinton peace-time to Bush war-time, shot up 317%.

In other words, on the third anniversary of invasion, we can say the attack and occupation is, indeed, a Mission Accomplished. However, it wasn't America's mission, nor the Iraqis'. It was a Mission Accomplished for OPEC and Big Oil.
http://www.rense.com/general70/pp.htm

Palast is pretty smrt.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-23-2006, 01:21 AM
Y2Mozz's Avatar
Y2Mozz Y2Mozz is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Favorite beer: Sam Adams Summer Ale, Yuengling, Magic Hat #9, Dogfish 90 IPA, Samuel Smith IPA
Posts: 3,829
Default

Bush wants oil. He doesn't want oil. He can't make his OWN oil.

Why doesn't he just lay down and die?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-23-2006, 09:15 AM
Halfmoon Halfmoon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
The answer can be found in a 323-page plan for Iraq's oil secretly drafted by the State Department. Our team got a hold of a copy; how, doesn't matter.
Yeah, sorta like Dan Rather's version of investigative reporting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-23-2006, 09:24 AM
Chubbs Chubbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,419
Default

I still believe this is about setting up a base of operations for the middle east. Saudi used to be our strong ally and we can see that relationship decaying. There will be troops in Iraq for the next 80 years. Just like we kept troops in Germany and Korea and Japan after wars there. We realize now that our next enemy is very likely to be from the Mid east and we want troops on the ground and ready before the poop hits the fan.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2006, 10:21 AM
2pac Shakur's Avatar
2pac Shakur 2pac Shakur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: short
Posts: 73,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfmoon
Yeah, sorta like Dan Rather's version of investigative reporting.
Or Colin Powell's.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2006, 10:31 AM
Chubbs Chubbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,419
Default

tupac, can you please change your avatar to something that is less disturbing. Maybe a picture from abu graib or some dead puppies. I don't even think GA likes that picture.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2006, 10:34 AM
2pac Shakur's Avatar
2pac Shakur 2pac Shakur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: short
Posts: 73,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chubbs
tupac, can you please change your avatar to something that is less disturbing. Maybe a picture from abu graib or some dead puppies. I don't even think GA likes that picture.
I'll see if I can find something I like today.
I do like the dead puppy suggestion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2006, 02:40 PM
Halfmoon Halfmoon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2pac Shakur
I'll see if I can find something I like today.
I do like the dead puppy suggestion.
I wouldn't change it. It's got that warm & fuzzy 'Hello and welcome to Walmart' feeling.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.25598 seconds with 7 queries