![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
can an actuary handle what a quant normally do?It seems to me that they are pretty much the same ..... I mean they do the modelling What do you think? Last edited by keepmeok2; 03-29-2006 at 12:00 AM.. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quant, (kwônt) n. Slang:
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks, DWSW.
Now, don't you think that we actuaries also need a cool slang term? Maybe something prestigious?
__________________
Carol Marler, FSA, MAAA, A Dedicated Actuary Just My Opinion (Although this statement is my opinion, and I am an actuary, it's still not a statement of actuarial opinion, and you really shouldn't rely on it.) Updated quotes May 24: Spoiler: |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
It seems from my (brief) internet research (thanks to google!), Quants: Need more education, get paid more, and work a HELL of a lot more hours than actuaries.
If you're willing to put in 12-15 hour days regularly, and collect a fat paycheck, it looks like it's a good gig. I'd rather have something closer to 9 hours a day. With as few weekends as possible. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree prestige is ultimately important. I suggest World High Overlords of Risk.
Last edited by Fresh Grad; 03-29-2006 at 09:53 AM.. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|