![]() |
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Have had tremendous results with the following setup
Under 500K records, MSAccess running on local machines. Over 500K records, MSSQL running off of a relatively cheap server (or running on a really powerful shared machine). Have easily run 20 gig databases with 20-30 million premium records in a single table and 10 million related loss records. The hardest part about using MSSQL is getting the large quantities of data into the database. Recommend some research on this item before hand as it can be tricky. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And I have never heard it is expensive. Talking about security issues with people who are happy with FoxPro is a joke itself. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
If there is budget, I would recomend SAS. It does everything a DBMS do (for actuarial purposes) and much more.
Like many others I followed the Microsoft PATH ACCESS -> FOX PRO -> SQL SERVER But eventually ended up with the following configuration: SAS 9.1 Analytics Server + SAS/ACCESS for ODBC + Enterprise Guide 4.1 No more size limits (except disk capacity), no more needs to compact the databases and endless logs. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello, does anyone know about some of the advantages and disadvantages of moving a mysql system to the cloud using cloud database solutions (such as this one), any known pitfalls to be aware of, and how do I know that it's time to move to a cloud based solution, or on the contrary that a system isn't fit for cloud environment.
Any thought will be appreciated, Thanks, Milly. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Freedom comes at a price.... And that price is less Freedom. **** Juan. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think my largest MP3 back then was ~9MB. Biggest game install was 2 or 3GB. Now my smallest FLAC or game are of those sizes.
I could see how a 37GB database could be considered gigantic. Heck I remember someone with a terabyte of total hard drive space in '02 was picked on for amassing a collection of pr0n of that size (no other reason one needed that much space). |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are a few things that you may want to consider:
- performance - scalability - manageability - security - extensibility And today's enterprise grade database offers more than just data storage and access; they also provide features like reports, business intelligence, data migration, data mining, master data management. You don't often find these features from desktop database software such as Access and FoxPro. If you're using FoxPro, I assume you are not just using its database feature, you may be using its development tool as well. Are you going to migrate the development part to something else as well?
__________________
AC. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
This was a 9-year-old thread that got bumped...
Quote:
__________________
And all this science, I don't understand; It's just my job five days a week...a rocket man, a rocket man... "I'm from Iowa. I only work in space." - Adm. James T. Kirk |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You may also want to examine if there is any legal obligation or business requirements, e.g. you have to store the data in your own country. It is difficult to make a recommendation without knowing the background. But you may want to compare more than 1 cloud provider, e.g. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/ At least Apple choose both Amzon and Microsoft to be its iCloud provider.
__________________
AC. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|