![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
Life Actuarial Jobs | Salary Surveys | DW Simpson & Co. | Casualty Jobs |
| Exams - General Sub-fora: CFA exams Non-specific topics and complaint department |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well at least "damndest" doesn't slip under the radar.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think that there is a time limit on them going back to look at the results again. But if you haven't heard by now, you probably won't.
I knew a guy who failed 150 and retook. The week before results were due out, he got a good new/bad news phone call. Good news, they had revisited the results from the prior May because someone had shown one of the questions to be defective - and it turned out that throwing this question out gave him a passing score. Bad news, he wasted a sitting retaking the exam. I suppose that if you think a question should have been declared defective, you can protest and have them revisit your paper to see if it would have made a difference. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have read that they destroy all papers after 6 months.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is the question in question?
(hey kinda rhymes huh?) Can somemore post the full question? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|