![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
Berlin - Madrid - Rome
- Paris - Hamburg - Warsaw |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was going through some older exams (c. 2001) earlier today, and I noticed a couple of questions on ruin theory. I've had this in classes before, but haven't they taken it off of Exam M? Didn't it leave the same time as simulation? Just wondering, thanks!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, Ruin theory & simulation & statistics is not on SOA M
__________________
Everyone dreams. Some people are just more active participants. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah I just noticed one of my study booklets is misleading.
It tells you Ruin Theory is only for the CAS 3 version of the exam and then provides practice problems from previous SOA exams. I hope someone knows if this topic is still tested on the SOA Exam M. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh thanks, I didn't see your reply. Was this topic discontinued from the SOA as of recently?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
oh nevermind I got my answer
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gambler's ruin is a very specific case.
Ruin theory evaluates the probability that an enterprise will have gone bankrupt (reached surplus < 0, where surplus = assets - liabilities) within a given time, or ever. That's the general idea. You could use a different definition of ruin. E.g, the probability that surplus is ever lower than initial surplus. Gambler's ruin also says the gambler quits if he ever reaches his target winnings. Usually ruin theory problems (at least in insurance) don't have an upper stopping criteria. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|