Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

CANADIAN ACTUARIAL JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2006, 09:54 AM
Feif's Avatar
Feif Feif is online now
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,999
Default WMD's Wases!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

Now, I understand this is from Fox, but they do have a link to a pdf of the actual report...
2pac, let me guess, you think it's all a lie...
__________________
Riskie Award Winner for 2011 Post of the Year!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2006, 09:58 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Did you actually read the article?

Or just the headline?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2006, 10:05 AM
The President's Avatar
The President The President is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Po'dunk USA
Posts: 13,573
Default

"Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2006, 10:12 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The President
"Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

Oh, I didn't even get that far...as soon as I saw that the article was about a press conference called by Lil' Ricky S., I snickered and stopped.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-22-2006, 10:13 AM
Feif's Avatar
Feif Feif is online now
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uma Karuna
Did you actually read the article?

Or just the headline?
You mean the part where it says they were manufactured before GW1? Yes, I read that part. But Saddam was supposed to get rid of them. He didn't. Therefore the war was justified.
__________________
Riskie Award Winner for 2011 Post of the Year!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-22-2006, 10:15 AM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feif
You mean the part where it says they were manufactured before GW1? Yes, I read that part. But Saddam was supposed to get rid of them. He didn't. Therefore the war was justified.
500 degraded munitions manufactured over a decade prior does not justify a war, nor do they constitute a "stockpile."

We probably have that many discarded WMD lying in a garbage pit at any given military base.

If you've convinced yourself that this collection of "WMD" justified the sense of urgency on which Bush sold the war, you're a fool.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-22-2006, 10:19 AM
Halfmoon Halfmoon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uma Karuna
Did you actually read the article?

Or just the headline?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uma Karuna
Oh, I didn't even get that far...as soon as I saw that the article was about a press conference called by Lil' Ricky S., I snickered and stopped.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-22-2006, 10:21 AM
The President's Avatar
The President The President is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Po'dunk USA
Posts: 13,573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feif
You mean the part where it says they were manufactured before GW1? Yes, I read that part. But Saddam was supposed to get rid of them. He didn't. Therefore the war was justified.
Hey, whatever makes you sleep better at night. This wasn't the WMD program Bush claimed existed.

I have a very hard time believing that you actually think that several thousand expcected deaths resulting from going to war would be worth cleaning up the 500 or so pieces of rusted out toxic waste. I have an even harder time believing you think it is worth the 40 thousand or so Iraqi deaths, and 2500 American lives that are way beyond any predictions that existed before we went in.

Although, maybe I am wrong. You probably would sacrifice a few thousand american lives to kill 50 thousand muslims.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-22-2006, 11:10 AM
Fish Actuary Fish Actuary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feif
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

Now, I understand this is from Fox, but they do have a link to a pdf of the actual report...
2pac, let me guess, you think it's all a lie...

I'm not sure if this is particularily relevant or not, but from paragraphs 10 and 11 of the article you linked...


Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."


Additionally...
On other websites (e.g. fark.com), I've seen it mentioned by others that when Iraq gave it's weapons listings to the UN before the war they mentioned having ~ 550 chemical weapons artillery shells, but were not sure of their location as they had been lost. I'm guessing that these chemical weapons may be the chemical weapons that Iraq admitted they owned.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-22-2006, 11:13 AM
ACCtuary's Avatar
ACCtuary ACCtuary is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Montgomery County, PA (Phila area)
Studying for none
College: MIT
Favorite beer: Sam Adams
Posts: 6,496
Default

Saddam was doing something snarky, or he would be been more cooperative with the inspectors.
__________________
Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but Markov Chains excite me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.23282 seconds with 7 queries