Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Non-Actuarial Topics
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

ACTUARIAL SALARY SURVEYS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2001, 10:51 AM
42 42 is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Betty Ford Clinic - Posters Anonymous wing
Posts: 4,702
Default

Odd news story from yesterday: Monday morning tragedy of the crash of flight 587 in New York. Monday evening winning lotto numbers in New Jersey: 587. Coincidence. But ... the payout is only $16 instead of the usual $275, supposedly because 17 times the normal number of people picked the number 587 that day. Explanations?
  1. People are just plain sick.
  2. Pure coincidence / random fluctuation.
  3. People believe that there is a natural balance in the world, and that if the number 587 had already been associated with something bad that day, it was overdue to be associated with something good too.
  4. The power of suggestion - after hearing the number 587 so much that day, people picked the numbers subconsciously without them ever making a conscious connection.
  5. None of the above.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2001, 10:56 AM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

D
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2001, 11:11 AM
Oracle's Avatar
Oracle Oracle is offline
Member
AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Delphi
Posts: 955
Default

The correct answer is F, all of the above. Inclcuding E, of course.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2001, 11:24 AM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I just heard the other day that it is common practice in some South American country (Columbia?) to play lottery numbers based on license plates of cars that are bombed. Perhaps the New Yorkers heard this, too, or were from that area.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2001, 01:04 PM
Numbers Nerd's Avatar
Numbers Nerd Numbers Nerd is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Midwest
Favorite beer: Ale, Lager, you name it
Posts: 1,092
Default

Does anybody else think that it is mathematically inappropriate to lower the payout on numbers where a lot of people play? After all, on this type of lottery, the payout doesn't increase when there are few than expected winners!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2001, 01:43 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I vaguely recall a similar situation where there was a number in the news that many people tried to play in the lottery. The system in that state was set up to only allow a number to be played X number of times - after that, the gambler would be told on-the-spot to choose something different. This way of limiting liability before the drawing does seem fairer to me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2001, 01:49 PM
Patience's Avatar
Patience Patience is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a kinder, gentler place
Favorite beer: Yogi
Posts: 39,945
Default

I thought this seemed strange and looked into it and those were the winning numbers, put stranger yet is that the midday drawing (they now have two daily) was 578, also a low payout of 81.50 (numbers can be boxed)
__________________
"I've been through the desert on a horse with no name...
In the desert you can remember your name
'Cause there ain't no one for to give you no pain"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-14-2001, 02:09 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/2001...tery_dc_1.html
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2001, 04:06 PM
Floyd Nootson's Avatar
Floyd Nootson Floyd Nootson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 79
Default

Stranger yet is this Quatrain that Nostradamous wrote:

In the city of great commerce, after the twins have fallen, there shall be a tragedy in the 11th month of the year. Many people will profit from, but not at the proper amount, the name of the traveler.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2001, 05:04 PM
E. Blackadder's Avatar
E. Blackadder E. Blackadder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Not far from US 1.
Favorite beer: Beer?! Blech. But Dad likes Dortmunder Union.
Posts: 20,778
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Not quite. He wrote
Quote:
And under the Dark of the Moon, a dillatory library patron shall mangle my words, to no effect.
__________________
If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination. Once begun upon this downward path, you never know where you are to stop. Many a man has dated his ruin from some murder or other that perhaps he thought little of
at the time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.20868 seconds with 7 queries