Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > CAS > CAS Exams > Exam 8 (old Part 9) - Advanced Ratemaking
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet the Employees of DW Simpson
Patty Jacobsen Simpson, Bob Morand, Kristyn Sakelaris, Sean Loboda, KC Cho, Maureen Matous, Ellen Page
Aaron Benton, Becki Tobia, Kimberly Skora, Margit Vogele, Barclay Burns, Jason Blundy, Dan Karrow, Tom Troceen
Valorie Mulder, Marianne Westphal, Carol Lee, Jennifer Retford, Kieran Welsh-Phillips, Lindsey Nelson, Emily Paxton
Angie Wachholz, Derek Mulder, Julie Garwood, Caitlin Cunningham, David Benton, Dave Retford, Sarah Cleveland, Rhonda Glick
Genevieve Shannon, Meghan Bautista, Carol Datu, Barb Rave, Jesus Perez, Dan Kane, Chris Zdenek, Scott Simon, Kriss Wells


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:04 PM
Aces Wild Aces Wild is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 77
Default 1997 #32 - Clark

This question asks to calculate the loss cost given a bunch of data. I am ok with everything except the premium on-level factor.

The question states "There will be a rate change of +10% on 1/1/97. Prior to this change, the last rate change was +5.0% on 7/1/89."

The historical accident years given run from 1991 through 1995, and the reinsurance treaty will be effective 1/1/97.

What I did, was on-level all premiums by multiplying by 1.1, but the all 10 solution multiplies by 1.05?

This makes no sense to me; if a policy was written in say 1988, I would multiply by 1.1/1.05 which is close to 1.05 but not quite. But in this case, all policies are written subsequent to the 5% increase and so the same policy written in 1997 would be at a rate 10% higher.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:24 PM
2M's Avatar
2M 2M is online now
Member
2005 Grammy Contest Winner
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 26,638
Default

The key piece of the problem is the words "losses occurring".

The treaty is effective 1/1/97 on a losses occuring basis, which means all losses that occur in the calendar year 1997. So you have to on level to the calendar year. The average earned date in CY 1997 is 7/1/1997. Thus, half the year will have the +10% rate change the other half will not.

The 5% rate change in 1989 is irrelevant to the calculation
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:36 PM
Aces Wild Aces Wild is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 77
Default

Thanks alot, that makes alot more sense now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.11827 seconds with 7 queries